W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2006

RE: [scxml] newbie questions on Executable Content

From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:05:42 -0400
Message-ID: <57686697B4E28949A90094A6469165C7FB82CC@ASP1EXCH1.aspect.com>
To: "Troy Cauble" <troy@bell-labs.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>

Troy,
  The definition of executable content is intended to allow any
language, whether XML-based or not.  The important caveat is that EC
should execute quickly since the state machine blocks during the
execution of such content.

The SCXML spec specifies a base set of executable content that all
implementations must support.  This includes <if>, <send>, <assign>,
etc., but implementations are allowed to provide extensions.  Of course,
application authors who restrict themselves to the base set are
guaranteed portability across SCXML implementations, while those who use
extensions are not. 

The examples in Section F should all be from the base set that is
defined in the body of the spec.  (That base set will be restricted
somewhat in the next draft, however.)  The EC in example C is ECMAScript
and is just there as an example.  

The examples with <ccxml:accept> are intended to show another way of
extending the language, since we show how they can be translated into
core SCXML <send>. (They are thus syntactic sugar rather than an actual
extension of functionality.)

The cond value of an <if> (and of the 'cond' attributes of events) must
support ECMAScript, though platforms could, in principle, offer
extensions there as well. 

We hope to have the next draft out in November, but are still working on
some fairly substantial issues. 

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Troy Cauble
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 12:10 PM
To: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: [scxml] newbie questions on Executable Content


Hi,

I've got an existing state machine engine that runs a home-grown
non-xml language and I'm exploring converting it to run SCXML.

I'm trying to understand the range of allowable Executable Content
(EC).  Basically, is EC meant to be flexible enough to allow any
language?  Any XML language?

What is the EC language shown in section F.2?  In section C?
What is allowed as the child of an <if> ?  As the cond= value
of an <if> ?

I see Custom Action Element examples like <ccxml:accept ....>.
So this form is used for explicit references to XML languages.
Otherwise EC content is anything???

(By the way, xmlns:prefix is specified for <send> but the examples
show it in other elements.)

Is EcmaScript (compact profile) support really a MUST?
While EC in general is anything??

Is an update still planned for November?

Thanks,
-troy
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 19:06:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:04 GMT