* Matt Oshry wrote: >The language in C.3 of VoiceXML 2.1 will be modified to clarify that the >undefined behavior is specific to how a conforming VoiceXML 2.1 >processor handles a document that specifies a version attribute with a >value other than 2.0 or 2.1. The statement was meant to clarify issue 88 >[3] from the comments on the Last Call Working Draft of VoiceXML 2.1. With this change applied, would there be cases where a document is non- conforming but behavior of processors would be undefined? Would the specification still say that behavior is undefined? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 13:24:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:02 GMT