W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2006

RE: [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node

From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:05:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CDB88C76D4D72244973F442A5305F0F9558A7E@BOS1EXCH1.aspect.com>
To: "Nestor Urquiza" <nestoru@yahoo.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>

The current version of  the spec uses the attribute 'location' to
generalize
the concept of 'name'.  The idea is that a location is designated by
some sort of path expression, and a simple variable can be viewed
as a degenerate path consisting of only one link.  So to assign to a 
variable named 'foo', write <assign location="foo" ...>.

However, we warn that the datamodel is the least stable part of the
specification and may change significantly in future drafts.  

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Nestor Urquiza
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:19 PM
To: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node


Hello guys,
I have noticed the scxml schema is not accepting @name
as a valid attribute within the <assign> node. 

The current schema is just concentrating in the
datamodel part forgetting about the fact that <assign>
node can be used to just modify a local variable and
then @name is a valid attribute as well.

Am I missing something? Thanks a lot!,

Nestor

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 14:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:02 GMT