W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: use namespaces and elements/attributes, not <?access-control?> PI (VBWG official response to last call issue)

From: Brad Porter <brad@tellme.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:56:52 -0800
Message-ID: <42385744.2070906@tellme.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-voice@w3.org

Thank you for the pointer to your previous email.  I had not seen that 
before.  I will follow-up on that. 

Are you available at 9am PT this Friday?  I have the following bridge 
reserved:

Dial-in numbers
   +1-650-930-9273
   +1-866-835-5636

   Participant: 0122070

Brad

Dan Connolly wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 17:01 -0800, Brad Porter wrote:
>[...]
>  
>
>>>I see the XML Schema WG mentioned in the related groups in your
>>>charter...
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/voice-charter.html#Coordination
>>>
>>>Have they reviewed the VoiceXML last call spec? Or has XML Core?
>>>If they've reviewed this use of PIs and OK'd it, perhaps I'll
>>>step aside.
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>The specification was sent to all working groups for review.
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, but sending it doesn't discharge dependencies from the charter;
>only getting an actual review does.
>
>  
>
>>  I'm not 
>>sure if they have reviewed this specification; I do not recall seeing 
>>comments from XML Schema or Core.  Is there someone in particular in XML 
>>Schema or Core who we should solicit review from?
>>    
>>
>
>It's traditional to start with the chair.
>
>By the way, I originally brought this up back in July 2004; see
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004JulSep/0042.html
>
>  
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 15:57:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:01 GMT