Re: [v3] Video media support in VoiceXML

"McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> wrote:

> This approach does have some issues which require further analysis
> for VoiceXML 3.0, including whether there should be a separate
> <video> element rather than re-using <audio>, and how controls for
> video-specific operations can be added. If others on this list are
> interested continuing this discussion offline, please let us know.

renaming <audio> to <video> prompts the question of whether to rename
VoiceXML too. DialogML? Probably not a great idea marketing-wise.

Max.