Are you refering to the rules defined in 3.1.4 of the VoiceXML specification? I'd be a little surprised if someone claimed to support VoiceXML 2.0 and didn't support them. Implementation *should* be independent of the speech recognizer, but I can imagine there might be instances where a recognizer has limitations which make it difficult or impossible to implement for the browser (if the recognizer only supported a single active grammar, for example) Jeff > Has anyone out there any experience with exploiting the grammar > precedence rules specified in the VXML spec? > > Specifically, do you know of a browser that supports this, and is > this support independent of the recogniser being used? > > Regards > Chris Harvey > NZ Communications Solution Development Group > > UNISYSReceived on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 18:14:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:59 GMT