> I responded: > There's no need for new syntax here. It seems that the following > should work (as is implemented on our platform): > $rule = > $<http://example.com/foo.gram#foo> > $<http://example.com/bar.gram#bar> > {$.result = $foo + $bar}; M. Le Huitouze said: Regarding Dean's answer, it may be some kind of workaround, but is nothing near a general solution. What if an external rule reference is done without mentioning the rule name (because the referenced module has a root rule)? What about a rule like the following? $rule = $<http://example.com/foo.gram#r1> $<http://example.com/bar.gram#r1> {$.result = $r1 + $r1}; ^^^ ^^^ I respond further: Of course, the same problem occurs for local rule references: $rule = $r1 $r1 {$.result = $r1 + $r1}; But the solution is simple (and also works for the root rule case): $rule = $r1 {$.firstres = $$} $r1 {$.result = $.firstres + $$}; (I could have used $r1 instead of $$ in both cases I think.} - DeanReceived on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 12:32:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:59 GMT