- From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:57:41 +0100
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Hi Al, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net> wrote: > <mostly agreement/> > > I still think that the Voice issue is limited to "you might want to use > more elliptical fragments in the examples" which is an editorial issue > not requiring tracking. It is an editiorial issue (readability of examples), but I still believe there is more than that in terms of implying that the schema is mandatory. So while I agree that this second issue should also be discussed in a more general EO/QA context, I maintain both comments, and I would still like my original request to be answered by the WG. Cheers, Max.
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:58:05 UTC