W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: ABNF: "public" does too much

From: Krause, Stefan <Stefan.Krause@Scansoft.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:32:43 -0500
Message-ID: <BBF29C9B95E52E4DB5C29A0ACC94E83B088608@ac-exch1.eu.scansoft.com>
To: "'jf_jackson@hotmail.com'" <jf_jackson@hotmail.com>
Cc: "'www-voice@w3.org'" <www-voice@w3.org>


Thank you for your comments on SRGS. I'm sorry for the delay in

(This is the reply from the Voice Browser Working Group to the
following mail:

As you mentioned, the SRGS spec does not distinguish between the
notions "top-level" and "activation". Therefore, "public" has just
the following two meanings:
- A public rule may be referenced by other grammars;
- A public rule may be activated for recognition (as top-level syntax
  of spoken input)

A possible distinction of these two meanings is one of the "Features
under Consideration for Future Versions" listed in Appendix I of the
SRGS spec. 

If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.

Stefan Krause (ScanSoft)
on behalf of the Voice Browser Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 03:32:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:36 UTC