W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: Language Identifier Clarification

From: Scott McGlashan <scott.mcglashan@pipebeach.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:42:18 +0100
Message-ID: <2764A29BE430E64A92EB56561587D2E71080CA@se01ms02.i.pipebeach.com>
To: "Jeff Haynie" <jhaynie@vocalocity.net>, <www-voice@w3.org>

The choice is up to the platform (or its ASR/TTS component), both en-uk
and en-us are equally valid specifications of en. It can of course make
its choice based upon whatever factors it thinks appropriate (locale may
be one such factor). The usual problem people face is where the document
is specified as 
en-uk but the platform only supports en-us.  

In VoiceXML, the languages are passed down the document tree and to the
ASR/TTS (sub)documents. In SRGS, section 5.4 states "Conforming Grammar
Processor may implement languages by approximate substitutions according
to a documented, platform-specific behavior. For example, using a US
English speech recognizer to process British English input.". A similar
statement will appear in the next version of SSML for TTSs.

Hope this helps,

Scott
Co-Chair, W3C Voice Browser Working Group



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Haynie [mailto:jhaynie@vocalocity.net] 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 17:03
To: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: Language Identifier Clarification



I would like to get better clarification on the use of ISO language
identifiers from RFC3066 in xml:lang attributes of grammars, prompts,
etc.

In the case of using the valid "en" primary language subtag - and when 2
more more languages are supported, such as "en-US" and "en-UK", by the
platform - and in the case no root xml:lang is specified, which one
takes precendence?  

I would assume that the platform would make the choice, based on the
locale preference of the location. Could the VBWG give further
clarification on this logic and their precendence?

Thank You.

Jeff


Jeff Haynie
CTO
Vocalocity, Inc.
www.vocalocity.net
404-487-1200 x1316
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 07:42:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:56 GMT