W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Using both voice and dtmf in abnf syntax

From: Andrew Hunt <andrew.hunt@speechworks.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:57:04 -0400
To: "S Sood" <s00d@rediffmail.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NEBBIPBPMMJJJOKAKJHNEEAAEKAA.andrew.hunt@speechworks.com>

Both the ABNF Form and XML Form of the Speech Recognition Grammar Spec
restrict the content of a single grammar document to a single mode.
"voice" and "dtmf" modes are defined in the 1.0 specification.

So with the current spec is it not legal for a single grammar to 
contain both DTMF and speech tokens.

Note that it is legal to activate a DTMF grammar and a speech grammar 
in parallel on a VoiceXML browser / grammar processor that supports this.

--Andrew Hunt
  Co-editor SRGS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of S Sood
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:49 AM
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: Using both voice and dtmf in abnf syntax
> Hi all vxml gurus,
>    Is there any syntax in ABNF which allows both DTMF and voice 
> for recognition. Like in nuance grammer we can specify dtmf-1, 
> dtmf-2 ...
> in grammer tag body, which enables both dtmf and voice, so it is 
> at users discretion to use which one...
>    Your reply will be appreciated.
> Regards
> Saurabh Sood
> _________________________________________________________
> Click below to visit monsterindia.com and review jobs in India or 
> Abroad
> http://monsterindia.rediff.com/jobs
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 14:57:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:35 UTC