W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy.

From: Eric Burger <eburger@snowshore.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:36:09 -0500
To: "Brett Serkez, Techie" <techie@serkez.net>, <vxi-discuss@metronomicon.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EEEDJPFPPHPFKDDLLMOKCELFDAAA.eburger@snowshore.com>
This is insane!  Saying that I, as a holder of intellectual property, lose
my rights because *you* decided to give away *your* code is nonsensical.

How about this: I decide to let people live in my house for free; therefore,
you must give away your house.


Am I a proponent of RAND?  No.  I was one of only three AC Reps that voted
against RAND.  However, arguments such as the one below does not help the
cause.

--
- Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Brett Serkez, Techie
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:01 PM
To: vxi-discuss@metronomicon.com; www-voice@w3.org
Subject: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed
RAND policy.


Eric S. Raymond's official position on W3C's RAND policy...

http://opensource.org/press_releases/w3c.html

[snip]

OSI suggests that the proposed clause 5 can be rescued by adding a suitable
interpretation of "non-discriminatory". The language in the State of
Maryland UCITA exempting open-source projects from warranty requirements
provides a suitable model:
The payment of royalties under a RAND license shall be waived for any
licensor of a computer program that is provided under a license that does
not impose a license fee for the right to the source code, to make copies,
to modify, and to distribute the computer program.
This interpretation of "non-discriminatory" would leave patent-holders the
option of continuing to collect license fees from implementors with plans to
charge for the secrecy of their software.



opensource.org home page
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 08:34:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:48:54 GMT