I like the idea of presenting some kind of automatic
quality information a la Arthur's stars, but in addition
to the gross overview (one star, two stars, three stars)
I think many users (myself, e.g.) would find it more interesting
to be able to click and see for themselves the detailed
information that Arthur's program is using to assess
quality (e.g. # of links in a page, amount of text, etc.).
I always like to have the option available of getting
the detailed raw data so I can make my own judgments.