(Anti Validator slant) it is only W3C aims & aspirations V's some of this groups thinking

(Anti Validator slant) it is only W3C aims & aspirations V's some of this
groups thinking

Recently I lured myself into trouble by part of the groups thinking, by
been told that using a cell phone to read web pages is the wrong tool for
the job.

Last night I was handed a cell phone and told “look at this, it makes it
harder to read” when I looked at the cell phone screen it had only one word
to every one line of the screen, to read it you had to scroll down and down
and down and …........n , when maybe all the information could of just
filled up just one or two screens if it passed the validator.

I replied that if that web page had of got put up without any HTML errors
(& passed the W3C validator) that page would read as normal just like most
other web pages out there such as W3C website & all our members websites
work.

Conclusion:
It is not the cell phone that is the wrong tool for the job, it is the
programs written to code up the text into HTML that is the real villain.

>From Eric.
If I suddenly stop replying to my new thread topic it is only because some
members opinion of this group still do not get it.