W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Warning validating with HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:01:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reG_ijYZhzz10PeHqSvWmSRoEtop7Mu7DAYL8jK-EoE6oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
Cc: Andrea Urbini <andrea.urbini@unifi.it>, www-validator@w3.org, Andrea Urbini <urbini@unifi.it>
The W3C working group responsible for that document removed that advice in
the recommendation when it was published.  That DTD is not supported, and
as far as I know is not up to date.  Sorry.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> Shane McCarron wrote:
>
> > As far as I know there is no official HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1 DTD.  So
> > you should not be using that to validate.  If you want to use HTML4
> > constructs and RDFa 1.1, you might just use the HTML5 document type.
> > You can see the latest RDFa recommendation related to this topic at
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/
>
> Alternatively you can follow the advice given by the W3C at :
>
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#validation
>
> which reads :
>
> > Documents written using the markup language defined in this
> > specification may be validated using the DTD defined in this section.
> > If a document author wants to facilitate such validation, they may
> > include the following declaration at the top of their document:
> >
> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML+RDFa 1.1//EN"
> > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/html401-rdfa11-1.dtd">
>
>
> Philip Taylor
>



-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 17:02:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:18:08 UTC