W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Re: Validator - WTF!!

From: Mr. Terje Lea <t.lea@t-lea.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:49:49 +0200
To: "W3C Validator Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20100928134949.58C026E096FF0@bmail02.one.com>
Hi
Thanks for your reply!

This is about the RSS xml format which is CLEARLY
defined by the Harvard files, both in words and examples.

Thus the channel-tagging and the failure to recognise it comes across
as lunacy!

What are they doing there?

Cheers!

On Sep 28, 2010 15:20 "Karl Dubost" <karl+w3c@la-grange.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> you might want your mails to <www-validator@w3.org> when it is related
> to the validators.
> 
> Le 27 sept. 2010 à 21:05, Mr. Terje Lea a écrit :
> > When the validator service can't validate a perfectly good
> > channel-tagging
> > 
> > like
> > 
> 
> Did you mean "check the well formedness".
> Which document format are you trying to validate against?
> Which validator are you trying to use? (URL)
> 
> You might want to use for checking the well formedness of your markup.
> <http://www.xmlvalidation.com/>
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 13:50:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:43 GMT