- From: Fred <themysterykat@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 21:08:04 -0400
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
As an example of the subject line, a page I sought to validate returned a report of 20 errors however, after sorting through all the extraneous data, I discovered there were only two. Just out of curiosity, I re-entered the two errors and ran the page through WDG's validator and received a report listing only the actual errors which greatly simplified a fix. Next, one error was purposely inserted and the page run through W3C resulting in a report stating there were nine errors. Apparently, you're following Microsoft's lead in making simple things complicated by listing several subsequent errors created as a result of one primary error which makes the actual problem more difficult to discern. Why not keep it simple? Fred
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 04:42:17 UTC