W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > March 2010

Re: [VE][html5] XHTML5 content-type value

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:17:19 +0000
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E2B60075-C71B-40D3-B237-D335F990BC5A@dorward.me.uk>
To: Cecil Ward <cecil@cecilward.com>
On 1 Mar 2010, at 13:18, Cecil Ward wrote:
> but are you guys aware of whether the above is set in stone now for XHTML5?

Nothing is really set in stone until it becomes a recommendation. 

> This seems an unfortunate "must", as requiring XHTML users to reformat
> content and serve it selectively from servers (rather than just being able
> to use an XHTML 1.0-BC style mechanism with only http headers changing
> according to UA capabilities) seems a real pity, a hassle with no real
> benefit.

That still does more harm then good. 

> If it is not yet set in stone, can mere mortals express their vote? How?

Join the working group. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/

> I assume that if you always use only UTF8 then it's a non-issue anyway, as
> no declaration is the reqd as it's the default. Is that right?


Oh, would that be so simple.

http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#determining-the-character-encoding

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 14:17:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:40 GMT