W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [VE][108] XHTML Basic 1.1 - lang="en" - legal or illegal?

From: Andreas Prilop <andreasprilopwww@trashmail.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: www-validator@w3.org
cc: Nicholas Savalas <nick@savalas.tv>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004231616180.22558@zen.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Nicholas Savalas wrote:

> I chose XHTML Basic 1.1 as my document type.

Use XHTML 1.0 or (still better) HTML 4.

That was easy.

Received on Friday, 23 April 2010 14:19:35 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael A. Peters: "Re: html 5 video code"
Previous message: t3cornelissen@aol.com: "Anja Sever"
Maybe in reply to: Nicholas Savalas: "[VE][108] XHTML Basic 1.1 - lang="en" - legal or illegal?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:40 GMT