Kratzer, Willi wrote: > Validating > http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/flags/Intel-ic11.0-int-linux64-revA.20090331.01..html > <http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/flags/Intel-ic11.0-int-linux64-revA.20090331.01.html> > Error [70]: "end tag for X omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified" > > The validator requests an end tag for <br>. > > <br> means “break” or newline. It does not make any sense to specify > “end of newline”. So it is natural to have <br> with no corresponding > end tag. > > A tag <br> without an end tag is not an error and should not be handled > as an error. > > In my opinion, this is a bug in the validator. The document you linked to is xhtml, which is a subset of xml. All xml tags must be closed regardless of their function. In the case of the br tag, since it never has children that is accomplished by using a self closing tag - <br />Received on Monday, 25 May 2009 11:34:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:13 GMT