You are correct that such a document should NOT be served as XHTML.  However, it also should not be REQUESTED that way.  That's just silly.  Its a pathological case that you should never see in the wild.  What you might see is a case where a client accepts text/html and application/xhtml+xml, and it prefers text/html.  In such a case, the server really ought to return the html version.

Andreas Prilop wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:

What do you do with
   Accept: application/xhtml+xml; q=0
I send the document as xhtml.

Why is it always the clueless who want to use XHTML with
application/xhtml+xml ?


Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: