Sean wrote: > > Hi My question relates to feed validation, > > I use Atom validation and the W3C validator does validate it as a > valid RSS feed. > > > > However RSS is not what I am using, it conforms to RSS 2.0 but it is ATOM. > > I wondered if W3C were going to provide such differentiation in their > buttons only because to quote- > > > The Free Validator instance hosted at http://validator.w3.org/feed/ reports my Atom[1] feeds as being Atom, not RSS. You didn't provide a URL, but I assume the problem is at your end, not the W3C's. [1] Not ATOM, it isn't an abbreviation. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 20:33:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:14 GMT