Roger Darlington wrote: > It failed to check about 80% of the html links, claiming that it had > reached the maximum numberr of documents. > > what a pathetic excus. why don't you incresae that number?? Bandwidth and processing power isn't free, and the W3C QA tools, which are free for the public to use, and don't get a whole lot of funding ( http://www.molly.com/2008/12/11/w3c-validators-in-jeopardy/ ). If you want to check a large number of documents, then I suggest you install your own copy of the link checker (there's a download link at the top of the link checker homepage) instead of complaining that you aren't getting enough out of the free service. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>Received on Thursday, 1 January 2009 17:19:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:33 GMT