|here , here , claps, now that sounds like about the truth.|
--- On Fri, 5/2/08, Rick Merrill <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: Rick Merrill <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: web site programming.
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008, 4:24 AM
"vary with the skill of the user"?! You've not considered the
users who expect the "tool" to be perfect and the user does not Know
At-All. I'd just like to see the Validator enter the main stream and
make a difference
for people. Right now the tool developers don't seem to care if their
And the Big League web sites - how about validating
David Dorward wrote:
> On 1 May 2008, at 20:53, Rick Merrill wrote:
>> I have a suggestion to float: How about adding a summary
>> page on the Validator web site where users (like us) can
>> add Validator results based on what software was used.
> Leaving aside the question of the Validator team publishing what is,
> effectively, a critique of various software packages, I don't think
> this is a good idea. As statistics go, it simply isn't a very useful
> one. You wouldn't be comparing like with like - the number of errors
> produced would vary with the skill of the user, and the content and
> size of each page.