Re: "snapshot" XHTML DTD for all current modules?

Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>> at 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-xml-i18n-bp-20080213/#integration-its-xhtmlmod 
>> . At least you ("you" meaning your working group) said it is 
>> conforming during your review of it.
> I had forgotten you had put this together - thanks!  Unfortunately you 
> do not appear to have created a DTD implementation of the module. I 
> will do that for you today.

oh, thank you!

> I note that you provide an example markup language that is xhtml basic 
> 1.0 + ITS.  Is that what you want created in DTD form for the 
> validator?  Or would you prefer XHTML 1.1 + ITS?  I think the later 
> would be more interesting to a broader community than xhtml basic 1.0.

this is really hard for me to judge. What do others think?

Felix

Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 12:38:09 UTC