On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, olivier Thereaux wrote: > We've had a lot of discussions, and I don't think we're getting much > in terms of new points and ideas. I think there is a new point. If I'm not mistaken some people want(ed) an Accept header because the W3C validator did not validate XHTML 1.1 served as text/html. But the validator now does validate XHTML 1.1 served as text/html. So what's the point of sending application/xhtml+xml to validator.w3.org?Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 17:00:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:11 GMT