On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Considering the real Web content, it is better to pick Windows-1252 > than a hypothetical generic encoding. This may be a good idea for a browser but not for the validator (at least the current version). See the new version (2008-04-25 16:00) of http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/test.htm Only "Validate as ISO-8859-1" gives a useful error report, namely "non SGML character number 144" and "end tag for element 'B' which is not open". "Validate as Windows-1252" is no better than UTF-8.Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 14:40:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:05 GMT