W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Content-Negotiation in check referer requests

From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:03:08 -0400
To: Etienne Miret <etienne.miret@ens-lyon.fr>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080423000308.GB20310@w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008, Etienne Miret wrote:
> I didn't forward accept-encoding, for reasons I explained in my first
> post. I guess you meant "accept-charset".

Indeed, you're right.
 
> They do clutter the interface, I was very aware of this issue, which is
> why I made two different patches. But I don't think I duplicated any
> options. When writing my patch, I mainly made use of available (but
> hidden) options. However, I'll check that.

Right again, I misread. I got confused by the fact you used the
http_accept_language param for the templates, while the CGI uses the
accept_language param, etc. Would it be better to stay consistent here,
or was there a rationale behind the naming?

-- 
olivier 
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 00:03:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:29 GMT