On 29 nov. 07, at 02:15, Andreas Prilop wrote: > I still believe that the following behaviour is illogical and > not really helpful. (It has been discussed before.) > > > Given a webpage that does not specify any encoding (charset). > > Then validator.w3.org reports: > > (1) No Character Encoding Found! Falling back to UTF-8. > > (2) Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line ... > it contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as utf-8 > > This makes no sense; and it doesn't help the user. You're not suggesting a better procedure, either. As far as I can tell, the alternative (as done by other tools) is to simply throw a fatal error whenever no charset is given. Trying to fall back to utf-8 at least helps in some cases. Better than nothing IMHO. Maybe what you would like is a different error message? Instead of "sorry I am not able to validate because it is not utf-8", in the case of a charset fallback, say something like "sorry, I am not able to read this document because it does not declare any encoding and an attempt to fall back failed. Please do this and that..." -- olivierReceived on Thursday, 29 November 2007 01:52:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:49:04 GMT