W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Valid Web Page

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:59:02 +0100
Message-Id: <DBECF6BD-0DA1-4217-A384-CB62BB6D733F@dorward.me.uk>
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
To: Samuel R Kirk <kirxklox@centurytel.net>


On 30 May 2007, at 19:54, Samuel R Kirk wrote:

> I was told this page; http://www.webhorology.com/valid_abbr.html
>  was valid xhtml, yet when I validate it by your standards it has  
> errors.
>
> Will you confirm that it is or is not valid xhtml?

It is not valid XHTML (and, bizarrely, has some elements not in any  
declared namespace, and other elements in the XHTML namespace). Since  
it is not XHTML 1.0 (with Appendix C conformance) it is being served  
with the wrong content-type too.

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 08:59:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:24 GMT