W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > March 2007

checklink: error report of Anchors and broken fragments ( again )

From: jesse <jessejesse99@sohu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:14:12 +0800
Message-ID: <5a1ef30a0703201014x2e05e8b8xc213e6e8c3ee0c10@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-validator@w3.org

I'm using LinkChecker online from http://validator.w3.org/checklink (
with default option values ). The checking result for
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32 show many empty anchors and broken
fragments ( please see the "Result" list below ).

But actually , the reported brokens ( for example "sgml: 53" ) are NOT
a broken at all.
What's the "list of duplicate and empty anchors" mean ? There're no
duplicate or empty anchors at line 68 as listed.

Is there any other options I must offer to get a Right result ? Or is
it a bug in checklink ?

Thanks,
Jesse

------------------------
Results

Anchors
Found 1 anchor.
List of duplicate and empty anchors
( and in the table, list many line numbers , all in red color )
... ...

List of broken links and redirects
Fragments listed are broken. See the table below to know what action to take.
(show 1 fragment broken, code 200 )
... ...

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32
What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed.
Response status code: 200
Response message: OK
Lines: 45, 52, (... and many other lines )
Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
input: 1413, 1416
form: 678
table: 695
para: 640
img: 1353, 1526, 1599, 1725, 2015
font: 1355, 1726
meta: 207, 231
isindex: 205, 223, 684, 1037
map: 1358, 1728, 1897
anchor: 1352, 1725
sgmldecl: 58, 87
(... ...and many others)
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 17:14:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:23 GMT