- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:57:29 -0400
- To: ryan <ryan@theryanking.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
hi Ryan, On Jun 14, 2007, at 13:23 , ryan wrote: > Here's an example: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http:// > example.com/a01-simple.html"> [...] Looks like the feedvalidator didn't like having to validate xml:base values when it can't figure the base URI for the whole document (since doesn't have any in the case of direct input). I patched that, the example you gave seems to be validating nicely now, it seems. I'll be sending my patch to the feedvalidator folks - I know that the direct input method is not officially supported by them but I hope they'll accept it. > * http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/ references "Atom 1.1". AFAIK, > there is no such thing. There's Atom 1.0 (aka Atom Syndication) and > there's draft 11 of the Atom Publishing Protocol, but those are > different things. I fixed that, too. And took the opportunity to update the feedvalidator to its latest version. Thanks a lot for the bug report. If you find anything, don't hesitate to report it. -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 18:57:50 UTC