- From: Gez Lemon <gez@juicystudio.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:55:31 +0100
- To: "Sierk Bornemann" <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Cc: "olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>, "Andries Louw Wolthuizen" <info@andrieslouw.nl>, "www-validator Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
On 31/07/07, Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am 31.07.2007 um 15:49 schrieb Gez Lemon: > > > so you would > > have to check something, otherwise you couldn't know. > > That's *exactly* what the discussion is about! :-) > You do *need* an information to make or to provide decisions. That's not been exactly what the discussion was about when I was copied in. I was asked if the following is sane: > * if accept headers present, and application/xhtml+xml not accepted, > send text/html > * else, send application/xhtml+xml It is sane, and possible to do. The rest seems to be concerned with encouraging the validator team to include an accept header, which I don't feel strongly about one way or the other. I hope you all come up with something that everyone involved in this debate is happy with. Cheers, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:55:40 UTC