- From: Aaron Dalton <aaron@daltons.ca>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:26:25 -0600
- To: www-validator@w3.org, Prilop2007@trashmail.net
- Message-ID: <46A61A21.4000906@daltons.ca>
Andreas Prilop wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Aaron Dalton wrote: > >> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >> >> I've done some searching and I'm not seeing my error. >> Can anyone point me in the right direction? > > Do not use XHTML 1.0 Transitional! > > If you need "Transitional" (for old pages), > then stick with HTML 4 Transitional. > > If you want XHTML 1.0 (for new pages), > then write XHTML 1.0 Strict - but only if you understand it. > > XHTML 1.0 Transitional is a clueless-indicator. And it leads > often to errors because people mix HTML and XHTML features. > > The real difference is not between HTML and XHTML - > the real difference is between "Strict" and "Transitional". > Originally I was using Frameset, but because of the validator error, I started messing with the headers. Since I ended up not using frames, I am indeed using strict. Regardless of what DTD I use, the validator still does not load anything and returns the same error. Cheers! -- Aaron Dalton | Super Duper Games aaron@daltons.ca | http://superdupergames.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 15:26:35 UTC