- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:14:01 +0300
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, www-validator@w3.org, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > > My suggestion: > > > > [[ The link refers to a resource that requires authentication, such as a > > password, in order to be accessed. Therefore, the link checker has not > > checked it. ]] > > Thanks Jukka. > This is a better wording than my suggestion, for the reasons you > mention. Any second opinion, or suggestion to improve upon this? Hmm... the above is indeed an improvement, but there's still room for some: it no longer answers to the "What to do" question, and "Has not checked it" is inaccurate/misleading; the link was checked, but the link checker wasn't authorized to access the resource.
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:15:03 UTC