W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > January 2007

Re: W3C HTML validator is broken

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:36:17 +0000
Message-ID: <45B8C061.8040704@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Taylor P <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
CC: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, bkml <atoz0to9@fastmail.fm>, www-validator@w3.org, David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>

To answer my own question, that does indeed
seem to be the case : both 110 good and 130
good, 120 bad.

** P.
--------
Taylor P wrote:

 > Confused.  Are we now saying that n mod 4 is what is significant,
 > not n mod 2 ?
 >
 > ** Phil.
 >
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:36:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:23 GMT