Re: XHTML Family Document Types and the validator

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:16:26AM -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Just a thought...  According to XHTML Modularization [1], all XHTML 
> Family Document Types *must* have a DOCTYPE with an FPI that matches a 
> certain pattern.  Given this requirement, would it be reasonable to 
> teach the validator that, at least by default, the parsing rules for 
> documents that have a DOCTYPE that matches that pattern be "XML"? 

There is nothing stopping non-XHTML Family Document Types matching
that pattern.

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/