On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:15:44 -0500 (EST) Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > >> (I think the validator's FAQ should have a >>self-contained explanation >> that contains the same information as the WDG FAQ entry, >>in a more modern >> style. A reference to Netscape 3.x, historically >>interesting as it >> might be, does not make a document very convincing these >>days.) > > I have updated the text at > http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp >to also discuss > cases that are problems for modern browsers: > >... > > Please let me know if you have further suggestions for >improvement. > I have similar documentation and a demonstration at http://www.illumit.com/Products/weblight/samples/markup_problems.shtml#entityUnknown -- Steve Ferguson - http://www.illumit.com/Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:15:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:20 GMT