W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2006

Re: [VE][108] Error Message Feedback

From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:02:01 +0900
Message-Id: <DEA4C56E-7241-4F1D-BCF5-31C3FE1C1DA1@w3.org>
Cc: Andreas Prilop <nhtcapri@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de>, www-validator@w3.org
To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>

Hello Philip, Andreas,

On Aug 22, 2006, at 01:14 , Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> Since you and I clearly differ as to our interpretation, may
> I suggest we each maintain a discrete silence until the validator
> team have had an opportunity to comment ?

I think most of the feedback page was written by me, so I'm the  
culprit here. Reading your mail exchange, I think I would suggest the  
following rewording, from:
# Add a meaningful subject: summarize your feedback in a handful of  
# If our system added [VE][XX] at the beginning of the mail subject,  
keep it. Otherwise, please precise which error message you are  
sending feedback about;
# Add a meaningful subject: the system will be adding a default  
subject to your mail such as "[VE][XX] Error Message Feedback".
  Please keep the [VE][XX] part if present, but if you can, replace  
the rest of the subject with a clear and concise summary of what  
feedback you are sending.

My rationale for the situation and proposal is:
- I don't think everyone will read the instructions, and I'd rather  
we received mails with a default subject than none
- I agree a meaningful subject is a big plus, especially for  
searching in the archives

What do you think?

Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 04:01:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:49 UTC