- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:28:47 +0900
- To: "Chris Ware" <chris.ware@mintrasystems.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Hi Chris, On Jun 24, 2005, at 4:42, Chris Ware wrote: > This isn’t really much of a problem at all, but when a page validates > as valid XHTML, the same HTML to include the Valid XHTML logo is > provided whatever type of XHTML is used – strict or transitional. > > The ironic thing is that including this in an XHTML strict document > will actually invalidate it because there are no such tags as height > and width. I am not sure where this belief comes from, but unless I am mistaken height and width *are* valid attributes for img in XHTML1.0, even strict. See the discussion at: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1478 That said... I have no strong feeling about having or removing the said attributes in the valid badge code. Does anyone on the list know if this is good/bad practice to have them? Regards, -- olivier
Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 06:28:58 UTC