Fascinating : I see the difference, and can't explain it as of now ... Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Philip TAYLOR wrote: > >>No, I think you missed the point : it quite clearly >>says 'character "1" not allowed in prolog.'. There >>/is/ no 'character "1"' in the source, so there must >>be a genuine bug in the validator code which is >>causing this 'character "1"' to be generated and >>inserted into the parsing stream ... > > > I see, then I am unable to reproduce this, there is no such message > in <http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=data%3Atext%2Fhtml%2C>.Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 17:14:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:48:57 GMT