- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:26:29 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
* Martin Duerst wrote: >My guess is that the conversion to punycode was correctly made before >resolving the host name, but that punycode was not used is the Host: >field of HTTP/1.1. Although that's not explicitly written down anywhere, >that's how it works (at least with deployed servers). That seems a weird interpretation of "Bad hostname", don't you think? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 08:26:26 UTC