W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Relaxed - new HTML validation service based on RELAX NG + Schematron

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:44:03 +0200
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <D0202000e-1042-2771C81B5F6A4EF1A7F45A4DD6CAF18F@pounder.tj.unn.no>

Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:

>It is irrelevant whether this grammar is expressed in DTD, RELAX
>NG or W3C XML Schema.

Not entirely — or at least so the Schema adherents would argue — but more
importantly, for most relevant published standards the only normative
conformance criteria are a DTD or set of DTDs. W3C Recommendations whose
normative definition is provided in the form of a Schema of some sort are only
just beginning to appear.


>I don't think that problem is name "validator" per se, but fact that many
>people are unable to see distinction between validity and conformance.

This is a different issue. The term “validation” has a specific and established
meaning in the SGML (and XML) context. Using this term to descibe a different
process is confusing and imprecise.

For a tool whose ambition it is to check overall conformance — a superset of
what validation provides — it would be more appropriate to label it as a
“conformance checker” (note “checker” rather then “validator”); particularly
when the tool doesn't perform validation per se at all!

-- 
“Violence accomplishes nothing.”   What a contemptible lie!    Raw, naked
 violence  has  settled  more  issues  throughout  history than any other
 method ever employed.  Perhaps the city fathers of Carthage could debate
 the issue, with Hitler and Alexander as judges?
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:44:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:19 GMT