W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2004

Re: program

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:37:12 +0100
To: Alan <afarrenk@tampabay.rr.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040924123712.GA11484@us-lot.org>

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:57:31PM -0400, Alan wrote:
>    BUT I ran yahoo and microsoft through your program and they are MUCH WORSE
>    OFF than I am. They had a couple of pages of invalid stuff!!  WOW
>     
>    Could the "validator" be a crapadator program and just BOGUS??

No, the majority of websites do not follow the published
specifications.

>    Feeling Better Cause nothing is good enough for the w3 crapadator!

These spring to mind:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chevrolet.com%2F
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fw3.org%2F
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgreytower.net
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdorward.me.uk%2F
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fthecoreworlds.net
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fzeldman.com
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webstandards.org%2F
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdebian.org


-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 12:37:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:15 GMT