W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > May 2004

Re: URI vs URL and long list of pedantic gramatical quibbles with the static pages

From: Beton, Richard <richard.beton@roke.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 13:29:19 +0100
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <40978C9F.5030007@roke.co.uk>

Philip TAYLOR wrote:

> I am sure that these responses are very amusing, to the cognoscenti
> at least, but is no-one prepared to offer a simple factual
> explanation as to why the universally-understood and used URL
> was apparently ditched in favour of its bastard offspring URI ?



Does this help?
    http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/uri-spec.html

"A Universal Resource Identifier (URI) is a member of this universal set 
of names in registered name spaces and addresses referring to registered 
protocols or name spaces.
A Uniform Resource Locator (URL)  ...  is a form of URI which expresses 
an address which maps onto an access algorithm using network protocols."

in pigeon summary,  URI  =  URL  +  URN

See also:
http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
http://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/

Rick :-)


-- 

Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk

Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House, Oldbury, Bracknell,
Berkshire. RG12 8FZ

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential to
Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without
permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or
change any contractual relationship.
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 08:31:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:13 GMT