Le jeu 19/08/2004 à 13:33, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > Le mar 17/08/2004 à 16:23, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > > The only reason I have heard in this thread to change the behavior of > > the W3C MarkUp Validator in this regard is consistency with validating > > XML processors that behave differently. > > Really? The main reason I've seen in this thread is to warn the user > when she uses a bogus or inconsistent doctype; that's a user feature, > not a theoretical one. FWIW, in a completely unrelated project I've been starting today, the presence of undetected bogus system ids (in some W3C documents) have started to appear more problematic than I had experimented before; using my XSLT processor (xsltproc) on documents where the System Id is unresolvable made it fail in several occasions; would it be an option to at least put a warning if the System ID is an HTTP URI non-dereferenceable? Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Friday, 20 August 2004 09:55:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:14 GMT