On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > What about serving it as something other than text/html? Per [2], it > seems like application/xhtml+xml is appropriate. Appropriate by the specifications, surely. The problem is that the vast majority of users use a browser that does not understand XHTML (except when faked to be text/html and processed as classic HTML). -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 18:28:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:14 GMT