- From: Matt Seitz <seitz@neopathnetworks.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:20:21 -0700
- To: www-validator@w3.org
olivier Thereaux wrote: > I cannot say whether this person just did not read the explanation or > did not understand it, but I suppose we could improve the bit on > "implicitly closed element". I think I just missed the part about an implicitly closed element. > <p> > If the matching opening tag seems to be present, it could be a > case where an > element cannot be within another element (e.g. you can't have a > <ul> in a <p>), > hence <em>implicitly</em> closing the tag, and leaving an orphaned > closing tag. > </p> Why does the Validator not report an error at the beginning of the illegal element (i.e., at the <ul> tag following the <p> tag)?
Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 15:21:17 UTC