On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, David Dorward wrote: > I'll just reference my answer of 8 days ago: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Apr/0081.html> I wonder whether it would be more useful to actually fix errors than keep telling over and over again that they have been fixed in a beta version. It's hard to convince normal authors to fix their invalid markup when the validator's pages remain invalid, despite repeated reports. -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/Received on Saturday, 24 April 2004 18:42:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 October 2008 01:13:12 GMT