On 5 Apr 2004, at 15:07, Mads / Shadeless Productions wrote: > I just used your XHTML-validation service -very nice, but! Hehe, > your validation page isn't valid XHTML... Thanks for the bug report (you seem to have forgotten to include the patch you mentioned in the subject, but it isn't needed), this probably is already fixed in beta. http://validator.w3.org:8001/check? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%3A8001%2Fcheck&verbose=1&fussy=1 This has been mentioned before. In March: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Mar/0079.html> In January: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Jan/0119.html> In December: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2003Dec/0042.html> ... and probably a few more times, but I'm not going to spend that long searching through the list archives which, for future reference, are available at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/> -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/> <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/>Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 10:22:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:13 GMT